Historical Evidence Confirming the真实性 of Jesus Christ's Existence

Article ## Historical Evidence for Jesus Christ's Existence

In recent times, some argue that Jesus Christ might be merely a concept rather than a real historical figure. Nevertheless, there is substantial and widespread written evidence supporting his existence over two millennia ago.

Dr Simon Gathercole, an expert in New Testament Studies at the University of Cambridge, highlights several key points concerning the historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth:

1 Established and Widespread Evidence: Within a few decades following his supposed lifetime, Jesus is mentioned by both Jewish and Roman historians alongside numerous early Christian writings.

2 Early and Detled Christian Writings: The first written references to Jesus come from apostle St. Paul's epistles, which scholars generally agree were penned no later than 25 years after Jesus' death at the earliest. Biographical accounts in the New Testament gospels date back approximately four decades post-Jesus' demise.

3 Eyewitness Accounts: These early Christian texts are grounded within the lifetimes of those who might have witnessed Jesus, providing detled descriptions that align with the cultural and geographical context of first-century Palestine. The creation of such a thoroughly Jewish savior figure during a time under Roman rule, when Judsm faced severe suspicion, would be challenging to imagine.

4 Non-Christian Authors' Perspectives: The Jewish historian Flavius Josephus offers two references to Jesus; one, though disputed for potential Christian scribal interference, and the other unremarkably mentioning James, the brother of Jesus, the so-called Christ. Roman politicians Pliny and Tacitus also document Jesus around AD93. They describe him as being executed under Pontius Pilate's reign AD26-36 while Tiberius was emperor AD14-37, which aligns with detls found in the gospels.

5 No Debate on Historical Existence: Notably, there is no historical debate about Jesus of Nazareth's existence; early Jewish Rabbis denounced him as an illegitimate son of Mary and a sorcerer. Pagans like Lucian and philosopher Celsus dismissed Jesus as a scoundrel but did not question his historical existence.

6 Contemporary Controversies: A recent survey revealed that 40 of English adults do not believe Jesus was a real person, indicating contemporary confusion about his historicity.

7 Archaeological Evidence: Some argue for an extraneous relationship between Jesus and Cleopatra through ancient coins or suggest the Shroud of Turin as Jesus's burial cloth. However, these clms are largely dismissed by historians.

In , abundant historical references offer little reasonable doubt that Jesus lived and died. The more compelling question, transcing history and objective facts, pertns to whether Jesus indeed lived and perished.

Simon Gathercole is a Reader in New Testament Studies at the University of Cambridge. His insights provide significant support for the widespread belief in Jesus's existence as an historical figure.

Explore more on these topics:

• Christianity

• Unanswered questions

• Easter

• Religion

Features can be shared or reproduced with appropriate citations to mntn the integrity of this scholarly discussion.

Contact us if you need any further information or seek clarification on specific points rsed above.
This article is reproduced from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died

Please indicate when reprinting from: https://www.vo00.com/Christian_Jesus/Historical_Evidence_for_Jesus_Christ_s_Existence.html